pignoklot zimpogrit !
March 13th, 2007 | by fish |Yes, I have gone completely mad. Finally, I’m admitting it.
No, there is a reason for this post. I stumbled across an article on slashdot, that asks Does Google Index Dynamic javascript content? posted by Greg from brainhandles.com. In this post, the author made a test page with a few different nonsense words on it which generated no hits on Google. Unfortunately I feel his test will now be somewhat invalidated mainly due to buggers such as myself putting his nonesense words into Google.
I’m quite interested to see the results 
UPDATE: Haha, I’m rated above the slashdot article in google for this one
4 Responses to “pignoklot zimpogrit !”
Cr04t on Mar 15, 2007 | Reply
Hi Goldfish and hi Brian (lol)
Today I have listened Hackers radio so I just stop by to see your blog…hey, Brian would look cooler with some headphones (lol)…
Anyway, cant wait for next edition of Hackers radio.. (say Hi to Croatia)
Greg Bulmash on Mar 16, 2007 | Reply
But you didn’t link “zimpogrit” or “pignoklot” to my test page, so that doesn’t help produce false positives. As long as my test page doesn’t show up in the Google results, I know the words aren’t being indexed from it.
Tell ya, though, seems I coined a word with “zonkdogfology” (one of the straight HTML words that it picked up immediately). My google alert for it picks up new results (and new uses) for it daily.
I’ll know it’s a hit when it gets its own entry in Wikipedia.
- Greg
Goldfish on Mar 17, 2007 | Reply
Weirdly enough one of the first adopters of this new term, zonkdogfology, is from 3DBuzz – a community that I belong to. Heh.
Dave on Feb 13, 2009 | Reply
Zonkdogfology is also seemingly related to Googlepig.